| Reviews |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| En Masse: Photographs by Camerawork Members (Thru April 2) Reputations Made Here If you've ever wondered why San Francisco has such a reputation for photography, check out the current show at SF Camerawork for a glimpse of fine work by emerging photographers in our midst. Jessamyn Lovell's portraits of rural America also happen to be portraits of her family, which has known some hard times since her mother began using a wheelchair. But Lovell's photos are not your classic Dorothea Lange shots of a farm family in dire straits. From the defiant look in her mother's eye as she hoists a shotgun, you can see that they're managing, thank you very much. Her adopted son and four daughters sport nose piercings and an array of hippie, preppy, Goth and skater looks, and do not smile as they pose in a yard with a broken fence and stare down the camera -- not exactly Norman Rockwell's America, but one much more recognizable as the place we call home. On the opposite side of the tracks, Mark Luthringer's "Ridgemont" is a series of digital shots of grand entry signs to real estate developments whose bastardized Tuscan-Alpine-adobe architecture comes with names to match, such as Crystyl Ranch and Miraggio. Here, Luthringer cleverly reveals the irony that the developers somehow missed: "The Preserve" is a hill featuring a sprawling model home and nary a tree in sight, and "Whitegate" says it all when it comes to a gated community of Spanish colonial haciendas. As Andrew Moisey points out in his artist's statement, all but two of the 43 presidents of the United States were frat boys -- so to get a good look at the future leaders of the free world, one need only look at Moisey's revealing shots of Pledge Week. "Three Pledges" shows a trio in sneakers and ties perched on a sagging couch awaiting instructions, with self-consciously casual poses and fresh-scrubbed faces that are eager, wary and feckless -- they're just kids, really, but already they're carrying themselves like presidential candidates. But take in the setting, and it's hard not to feel sorry for these pledglings: all that effort just to hang out in a dim living room with dingy striped wallpaper, sticky linoleum floors and a scuffed-up door that's been slammed like pledges during rush. -- Alison Bing, special to SF Gate |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| For this one (again, not a review) it was an honor to be mentioned at all. There were 17 accomplished photographers in this show, so it's pretty flattering that she chose to mention me. And write about me so well. Eager, wary, and feckless. How dead on is that. If you can bear to remember the last election, consider about how perfectly that describes the three stages of both candidacies. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3/24-5/24 Fellowship of the Thing In trying to figure out what sets fraternity members apart from other beer-slurping, skirt-chasing, partymongering college men, photographer Andrew Moisey hit upon the idea that a surplus of brotherhood is "responsible for everything bad and good that happens inside the fraternity house." The Berkeley grad was allowed a certain amount of free access to Greek life because of his younger brother's pledge status, and the result is his debut exhibition, Evidence of Brotherhood, a show of silver gelatin prints currently on display at Cal's ASUC Auxiliary Art Studio. Moisey is now a first-year doctoral student in film studies; his photos owe much to movies, in that they capture action in crisp tones. But don't expect Animal House -- the pictures show ceremonial machismo, quiet bonding, and romantic canoodling (hetero, of course) in a way that highlights their subjects' occasional foolishness, but most often, their vulnerability. Info: 510-642-6161. -- Stefanie Kalem, East Bay Express |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| This isn't really a review. But it was the first time someone had ever talked about my work in print without interviewing me. Personally, I don't think my work owes shit to the movies, and least of all for having captured action in crisp tones. Would you ever describe a movie this way to someone? Whatever. She's right about highlighting their foolishness and vulnerability, but then again, all documentary work highlights vulnerability. It's a trick we do that makes people think we're digging real deap. It's cliche both to do this in and say this about documentary work. But I am proud to have highlighted their foolishness. No one ever does this fairly. I do it without making fun of anyone. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| From: Agapius Honcharencko <agapiushoncharenko@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, April 9, 2004 6:06am To: andrewmoisey@hotmail.com Subject: About the 2004 Fellow Dear Andrew, Your photography is gay. The american upper class has its newest, gayest photographer. As it's stated on the Film Studies webpage, "(Your) work won the endorsement of the fraternity's online alumni," and then with shock and awe the Dorothy Lange Fellowship??!! She built her career documenting people exploited by born-elite dumbfucks at the top of our class heirarchy. Now you go out and shoot them (with a camera) and try to make a sensitive portrait. I like the sense of poverty in the frat photos. You document all the real conditions, except the fat bank accounts, big cars, and big screen football games. It makes me want to see every priveleged Mall-jock outdrink himself until his brain explodes. And, um, could you photograph that? Now you go around photographing laundrymats and blacks to add weight and depth to your oeuvre. Click, click-airhead--no one wants your perspective. You got a grant because you depicted nothing too unsettling, only making rich moms and dads think deep about their sons living hard in a magazine and getting a Real World education. Drop the pompous attitude. You do not deserve an award. They are mediocre photographs at best no matter the subject matter. You're in store for a long academic hazing Mr. PhD candidate. No wonder higher education sux. Hollywood is waiting for your ass. Agapius |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| This, my first unpublished review, was written by some guy who in 2002 tried but failed to steal away Christine. As you can see, he's still bitter about it two years later. How flattering it is to think he's been following my exploits for so long. But it makes sense if you consider that he's a photographer too. |
||||||||||||||||||||||